• Print

Compensation architecture

Compensation of the Board of Directors

The compensation of the Board of Directors is governed by a compensation regulation, is reviewed by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee (NRC) annually and, if necessary, adjusted by a decision of the full Board of Directors based on a proposal by the NRC.

The compensation of the Board of Directors consists of a fixed cash component and a restricted share unit (RSU) component with a fixed grant value. Each RSU represents a right to receive a Sulzer share free of charge after a certain period, as further detailed below. Further, Board members are entitled to a lump sum to cover business expenses. The RSU component strengthens the long-term alignment of the interests of the Board members with those of the shareholders. To reinforce the focus of the Board of Directors on the long-term strategy and to strengthen its independence from the Executive Committee, the compensation of the Board of Directors contains no performance-related elements and Board members are not entitled to pension benefits.

The amount of compensation for the Chairman and for the other members of the Board of Directors is determined based on the relevant compensation benchmarks (see box “Compensation benchmark” in section “Compensation governance and principles” of this Compensation Report). The compensation reflects the responsibility and complexity of their respective function, the professional and personal requirements placed on them, and the expected time required to fulfill their duties. In 2018, an independent external third-party conducted a board compensation benchmark for Sulzer. Based on the resulting data, the NRC concluded that Sulzer’s Board compensation structure and amounts were broadly in line with Sulzer’s desired position in the market for the time being, however, it remains subject to review and potential adjustments in 2019. The ongoing Board compensation structure and amounts are described in the table below.

Annual compensation of the Board of Directors1)

in CHF

Cash component (net of social security contributions)

Grant value of restricted share units (net of social security contributions)

Lump-sum expenses

Base fee for Board Chairmanship 2)

420’000

250’000

10’000

Base fee for Board Vice Chairmanship

100’000

155’000

5’000

Base fee for Board membership

70’000

125’000

5’000

Additional committee fees:

 

 

 

Committee Chairmanship

40’000

 

 

Committee membership

25’000

 

 

1) Compensation for the period of service (from AGM to AGM).

2) The Chairman of the Board of Directors does not receive additional remuneration for committee activities.

The members of the Board of Directors are remunerated for their service during their term of office (from AGM to AGM). The cash remuneration is paid in quarterly installments for Board members and monthly installments for the Chairman; the expense lump sum is paid out in December and the RSU are granted once a year. The number of RSU is determined by dividing the fixed grant value by the volume-weighted average share price of the last ten trading days before the grant date, which lies between the date of the publication of the year-end results and the Annual General Meeting. One-third of the RSU each vest after the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date respectively. Upon vesting, one vested RSU is converted into one share of the company. The vesting period for RSU granted to the members of the Board of Directors ends no later than on the date on which the member steps down from the Board. Although the value of the RSU grant is fixed (at grant), it then fluctuates with the share price during the vesting period, which means that the value at vesting can differ from the value at grant.

Compensation of the Executive Committee

The compensation of the Executive Committee is governed by internal regulations such as the total reward policy, the bonus plan, the performance share plan and benefits plans. The compensation of the Executive Committee is reviewed by the NRC annually and, if necessary, adjusted and approved by decision of the Board of Directors based on a proposal by the NRC.

In line with the pay-for-performance principle, a significant portion of the compensation of the CEO and the other members of the Executive Committee consists of variable incentives based on performance. The compensation is structured as follows:

Fixed compensation:

  • Base salary (cash)
  • Retirement and fringe benefits

Variable compensation:

  • Short-term annual bonus (cash)
  • Long-term incentives (performance share plan)

Compensation elements for the members of the Executive Committee

 

Base salary

Benefits

Short-term incentive plan (bonus plan)

Long-term incentive plan (PSP 2018)

Main parameters

Function, level of role, profile of incumbent (skill set, experience)

Pension and social security contributions, fringe benefits

Achievement of financial and individual objectives

Achievement of long-term, company-wide objectives

Key drivers

Labor market

Protection against risks, labor market

Operational EBITA, sales, operational operating net cash flow (opONCF)

Operational EBITA growth, operational return on average capital employed adjusted (opROCEA), relative total shareholder return (TSR)

Link to compensation principles

Competitive compensation

Competitive compensation

Pay for performance

Sustainable growth and value creation

Vehicle

Cash

Pension and insurance plans, perquisites

Cash

Performance share units (PSU) settled in shares

Amount

Fixed

Fixed

Variable, capped at 200% of target bonus. Target bonus amounts to 90% of annual base salary for the CEO and 60% of annual base salary for the other members of the Executive Committee.

Variable. Grant value is defined based on the Global Grade and corresponds to CHF 1’440’000 for the CEO and between CHF 330’000 and CHF 400’000 for the other members of the Executive Committee (EC). Vesting payout percentage is capped at 250% and vesting value is capped at CHF 3’600’000 for the CEO and at CHF 825’000 to CHF 1’000’000 for the other members of the EC.

Grant/payment date

Monthly

Monthly and/or annually

March of the following year

July 1, 2018

Performance period

1 year (January 1, 2018–December 31, 2018)

3 years (January 1, 2018–December 31, 2020)

Vesting date

December 31, 2020

The PSP grant date was set to be July 1, 2018 in consideration of the share price collapse in April 2018. Further information can be found in the section “Performance share plan” below.

Base salary (fixed, in cash)

The base salary is determined at the discretion of the Board of Directors based on the market value of the respective position and the incumbent’s qualifications, skills set and experience. Positions are evaluated according to the Mercer International Position Evaluation (IPE). The IPE is a proprietary global job evaluation methodology based on a series of business-related factors to determine internal job levels. Application of the IPE methodology provides an organizing framework based on a job’s value within the context of an organization and the wider commercial environment. The IPE implementation follows a simple process focusing on organization structure, the complexities of the business and the alignment of jobs to the business. The IPE serves as a basis to build the internal salary structure. In 2018, the IPE continued to be rolled out and implemented on a group-wide basis.

Bonus (variable, performance-based, cash remuneration)

The bonus rewards the financial performance of the company and/or its businesses, as well as the achievement of individual performance objectives over one calendar year. The target bonus is expressed as a percentage of annual base salary according to the level of the role in the IPE framework. It amounts to 90% for the CEO and to 60% for the other members of the Executive Committee.

For the CEO and the other members of the Executive Committee, 70% of the bonus is based on the achievement of financial objectives at company and/or division level, and 30% is based on the achievement of individual objectives as described below:

Category

Weight

Objectives

Rationale

 

CEO/CFO/ CHRO/ CCMO

Division President

Financial performance

70%

Operational EBITA in % of sales

Measure of profitability (bottom line)

Sulzer

25%

7.5%

Division

 

17.5%

Sales

Measure of growth (top line)

Sulzer

25%

7.5%

Division

 

17.5%

Operational operating net cash flow (opONCF)

Measure of cash generated by the revenues

Sulzer

20%

6%

Division

 

14%

Individual performance

30%

Sulzer Full Potential initiatives (SFP)

Sulzer’s transformation into a truly market-oriented, globally operating and integrated company

Individual

10%

10%

Growth initiatives

Include initiatives that support the growth of Sulzer, such as M&A projects, breaking into new markets or new accounts

Individual

10%

10%

Faster and better

Initiatives focused on the profitability of Sulzer, with objectives linked to speed (“faster”) and quality (“better”)

Individual

10%

10%

 

 

 

 

Total

100%

100%

The objectives are set within the annual target-setting process. For each financial objective, the following parameters are set upfront:

  • An expected level of performance (“target”), the achievement of which leads to a payout factor (on the respective performance metric) of 100%.
  • A minimum level of performance (“threshold”) below which the respective payout factor is zero.
  • A maximum level of performance (“cap”) above which the respective payout factor is capped at 200%. With respect to the financial objectives, a performance of 200% of the target figure is required to achieve a payout factor of 200%.

Between threshold and target, as well as between target and cap, the payout factor is interpolated linearly. The weighted average of the resulting payout factors on each performance metric will be multiplied by the target bonus amount to derive the actual bonus which will be paid out in March of the following year.

Sulzer strives for transparency in relation to pay for performance. However, disclosure of financial and individual objectives may create a competitive disadvantage to the company, because it renders sensitive insights into Sulzer’s strategy. To ensure transparency while avoiding competitive risk, Sulzer provides a general performance assessment at the end of the performance cycle (see section “Compensation of the Executive Committee” in chapter “Compensation of the Board of Directors and the Executive Committee”).

Performance share plan (variable, performance-based, share-based remuneration)

A PSU is a conditional right to a certain number of shares of the company, subject to ongoing employment and to the achievement of strategic/financial performance targets on a group level over the three-year performance period. The performance share plan (PSP) rewards selected participants based on the performance of the company over three years and aligns the interests of the participants with those of the shareholders by delivering a substantial portion of the compensation as company equity. This emphasizes and supports Sulzer’s focus on pay for performance and sustainable growth, with a long-term perspective and additional retention effect on employees. Furthermore, the actual delivery of shares is dependent on the achievement of strategic and financial targets on a group level, thus strengthening the group perspective and a shared perspective with investors and shareholders.

The PSP is a plan with annual grants and is available exclusively to the members of the Executive Committee and of the Sulzer Management Group (defined by the job level in the IPE framework). The grant value is determined based on the level of the executive’s role. It amounts to CHF 1’440’000 for the CEO and to between CHF 330’000 and CHF 400’000 (determined by the Board of Directors) for the other members of the Executive Committee. The number of performance share units (PSU) granted is calculated by dividing the grant value by the three-month volume-weighted average share price before the grant date. The PSU grant date in 2018 was shifted to July 1, in line with the flexibility provided for by the PSP regulation, to allow the share price to stabilize after the important fluctuations triggered by the US sanctions applied in April on Sulzer’s reference shareholder Renova. This shift mitigated short-term volatility concerns by having the PSU grants based on a less volatile three-month average price, which also included the off-exchange share buyback of 5.00 million shares in the same period.

The key performance criteria being measured over the three-year performance period of PSU are:

  • Operational EBITA growth, weighted with 25%;
  • Average opROCEA, weighted with 25%;
  • Relative total shareholder return (TSR) weighted with 50% and measured against two different peer groups: 75% of this part of the performance measurement is based on the performance against international peers measured as percentile ranking, and 25% is based on the performance against the companies of the Swiss Market Index Mid (SMIM) measured as a delta (see details in the box below).

The Board of Directors deems these metrics to be the most relevant key performance indicators for the sustainable development of the Sulzer group, combining growth, profitability and shareholder return in comparison to the relevant peers and markets.

Both peer groups did not change in the reporting year.

The Board of Directors has the right to change the composition of the peer group in case of a merger or acquisition or any other change leading to a delisting or a fundamental change in the scope of the business of a peer group company. In such a situation, the Board will select a new peer company. There is a predefined successor list of companies to support the Board of Directors in the selection process.

For each performance condition of the PSP, a threshold, target and cap performance level is determined, which in turn determines the achievement factor as follows:

On the vesting date, the number of vested shares is calculated by multiplying the initial number of PSU granted by the weighted average of the achievement factor of each performance condition as follows:

Number of PSU granted x [(achievement factor opEBITA growth x 25%) + (achievement factor opROCEA x 25%) + (achievement factor relative TSR x 50%)] = number of PSU vested

For each vested PSU, a Sulzer share will be delivered free of charge to the employee.

However, while the above mentioned performance assessment impacts the number of PSU vested and, consequently, the number of shares delivered, there might also be an increase in value per share over the three-year performance period, which may have a relevant impact on the actually delivered total value after three years. Therefore, the number of vested PSU is subject to an absolute value cap based on the level of the executive’s role in the IPE framework. The absolute vesting value cap amounts to CHF 3’600’000 for the CEO and between CHF 825’000 and CHF 1’000’000 (representing, in each case, 2.5 times the original grant value) for other Executive Committee members.

Sulzer strives for transparency in relation to pay for performance. The target achievement levels of relative performance objectives are not considered confidential and are thus disclosed (see above). However, disclosure of internal financial and individual objectives may create a competitive disadvantage to the company because it renders sensitive insights into Sulzer’s strategy. To ensure transparency while avoiding competitive risk, Sulzer provides a general performance assessment at the end of the performance cycle.

In case of termination of employment, the following provisions apply:

  • Termination by the employer for cause: unvested PSU forfeit.
  • Termination as a result of retirement: vesting and performance measurement of PSU continues according to plan, no early allocation of the shares.
  • Termination of employment for any other reason: for Executive Committee members, the number of unvested PSU vest on a pro rata basis (number of months between grant date and termination date) according to the achievement factor at the end of the vesting period. There is no early allocation of the shares.

Upon the occurrence of a change of control, PSU will vest immediately on a pro rata basis, subject to a performance assessment by the Board of Directors. In such a case, the Board of Directors may also determine a cash settlement of the awards.

Furthermore, the Board of Directors may determine that an award is forfeited in full or in part (malus) or that a vested award will be recovered in full or in part (clawback) in situations of material misstatement of the financial results, an error in assessing a performance condition or in the information or assumptions on which the award was granted or vested, serious reputational damage to the company, gross negligence, or willful misconduct on the part of the participant.

The PSP regulation in its article 15 allows for corrections in case of extreme market situations or in the event of activities or decisions of large Sulzer shareholders which have a significant impact on Sulzer’s TSR. The US sanctions targeting Renova in April 2018 was deemed to be such an extraordinary event, given its dramatic mid-term impact on the share price of Sulzer and this despite sustained strong operational performance and positive strategic developments. Consequently, the Board decided in May 2018 to add a TSR performance floor to the ongoing measurement of the PSP 2016 and PSP 2017, protecting the performance measurement mechanism against undue distortion. The introduction of the floor led to a step-up in the market valuation of the respective PSU, which is duly disclosed in the compensation tables of this report.

Further information on share-based compensation can be found in note 11 to the “Financial Statements of Sulzer Ltd.” 

Benefits

Members of the Executive Committee participate in the regular employee pension fund applicable to all employees in Switzerland. The retirement plan consists of a basic plan that covers annual earnings up to CHF 146’629 per year and a supplementary plan in which income over this limit, up to the ceiling set by law, is insured (including variable cash remuneration). The contributions are age-related and are shared between the employer and the employee.

Furthermore, each member of the Executive Committee is entitled to a representation allowance in line with the expense regulations for all members of management in Switzerland and approved by the tax authorities.

Contracts of employment

The employment contracts of the Executive Committee are of undetermined duration and have a notice period of maximum 12 months. Members of the Executive Committee are not entitled to any impermissible severance or change of control payments. The employment contracts of the Executive Committee may include non-competition agreements with a time limit of one year and with a maximum total compensation of one annual target compensation.

There are no contractual shareholding requirements for Executive Committee members or other employees.